Optical CT (OCT) plus cardiac MRI (CMR) provides a more relate prognosis in the majority of females presenting with myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA).
The multimodal imaging formulation identified the underlying clarification for MINOCA in 85% of females in the HARP-MINOCA observe. Overall, 64% of females had a lawful MI and 21% had but another nonischemic prognosis, most recurrently myocarditis.
“OCTCMR findings correlated effectively with OCT culprit lesions, demonstrating that nonobstructive culprit lesions regularly reason MINOCA,” talked about observe author Solidarity Reynolds, MD, director of New York University Langone’s Sarah Ross Soter Center for Women’s Cardiovascular Research.
Dr Solidarity Reynolds
The outcomes had been presented on the digital American Coronary heart Affiliation (AHA) Scientific Classes 2020 and published concurrently in Circulation.
MINOCA occurs in up to 15% of sufferers with MI and is defined as MI meeting the smartly-liked definition but with lower than 50% stenosis in all major epicardial arteries on angiography and no relate alternate prognosis to expose the presentation.
It is thrice more smartly-liked in females than in males and additionally disproportionately affects Sunless, Hispanic, Maori, and Pacific people. MINOCA has plenty of causes, main to uncertainty in diagnostic testing and medication.
“Varied doctors show sufferers different messages about MINOCA and could presumably well incorrectly assert the event wasn’t a coronary heart attack,” Reynolds talked about in an earlier press briefing. “I had a patient who used to be rapid ‘your arteries are originate,’ they every now and then gave her Xanax.”
As allotment of the Women’s Coronary heart Attack Research Program (HARP), researchers enrolled 301 females with a medical prognosis of MI, of whom 170 had been diagnosed with MINOCA sometime of angiography and underwent OCT for the time being, adopted by CMR within 1 week of the extreme presentation.
All footage had been interpreted by an self reliant core laboratory blinded to results of the opposite tests and medical info. The closing cohort included 145 females with interpretable OCT footage.
Their median age used to be 60 years, 49.7% had been white non-Hispanic, and 97% presented with a provisional prognosis of non–ST-phase MI. Their median peak troponin level used to be 0.94 ng/mL.
OCT identified a sure or probable culprit lesion in 46% of females, most recurrently atherosclerosis or thrombosis. On multivariable analysis, having a culprit lesion used to be related to older age, irregular angiography findings on the positioning, and diabetes, but now not peak troponin level or severity of angiographic stenosis.
CMR on hand in 116 females confirmed proof of infarction or regional injury in 69%. Multivariate predictors of an irregular CMR had been greater peak troponin and diastolic blood stress but now not an OCT culprit lesion or angiographic stenosis severity.
When the OCT and CMR results had been blended, a clarification for MINOCA used to be identified in 84.5% of females. Three-fourths of the causes had been ischemic (64% MI) and one-quarter had been nonischemic (15% myocarditis, 3% Takotsubo syndrome, and 3% nonischemic cardiomyopathy). In the final 15%, no clarification for MINOCA used to be identified.
To emphasize the enact multimodal imaging can maintain on medication, Reynolds highlighted a 44-yr-former girl and not utilizing a likelihood factors for coronary artery illness who had chest be troubled in the context of heavy menstrual bleeding, a low hemoglobin level, and peak troponin level of 3.25 ng/mL.
, imaging published a left anterior descending (LAD) plaque fracture in a thin-cap fibroatheroma, causing a little transmural infarction on the terminus of the LAD.
“Without this prognosis, it’s now not going she would maintain obtained antiplatelet therapy or statins and could presumably well need been given a prognosis of provide/query mismatch, when the right prognosis used to be MI,” Reynolds noticed.
“At final we can assert right here’s now not correct crazy females. There’s de facto one thing occurring,” panelist Roxana Mehran, MD, Icahn College of Medication at Mount Sinai in New York Metropolis, remarked. “You might presumably need now rapid us right here’s in all likelihood atherosclerosis for shapely noteworthy 85% of the cases. So make the prognosis and, for sure, be trot you address these sufferers accordingly for likelihood factor modification, really obsessed on a ruptured plaque.”
Combining OCT and MRI can lead to a more relate prognosis and better medication but additionally raises fees and logistical concerns.
“Implementation challenges are that now not every assemble of testing is on hand in every medical center,” Reynolds rapid theheart.org | Medscape Cardiology. “Many centers maintain cardiac MRI,” whereas “OCT is now not for the time being on hand at most medical centers where coronary heart attack sufferers are handled but is on hand at really just correct centers.”
Asked sometime of the session about the usage of CT angiography, Reynolds talked about, “For me, CT is worthwhile after I’m now not sure if there is any plaque for the reason that angiogram regarded really smartly-liked and there used to be no opportunity to assemble intracoronary imaging. And most steadily that can reduction me, in explicit, if a patient would now not favor to decide on a statin.”
Invited discussant, Martha Gulati, MD, president-elect of the American Society for Preventive Cardiology, pointed out that the European Society of Cardiology MINOCA pointers counsel OCT and CMR, whereas the 2019 AHA commentary on MINOCA, which she coauthored, additionally recommends OCT and CMR, but nearly as one or the opposite.
“We already talked about that you should well presumably serene assemble cardiac MR to take a look at out to make a prognosis, but I issue the combo of the 2 wants to be emphasised after we next draft these pointers. It really will reduction,” Gulati rapid theheart.org | Medscape Cardiology.
“Nonetheless utilizing OCT, particularly, wants to be in the surroundings of the MI. I fabricate now not issue you worship to have to assemble a map all another time,” she talked about. “So we in point of fact need it to became more broadly on hand because on the time of an MI, you should well presumably now not basically know that you’re now not going to search out an obstructive lesion.”
Gulati pointed out plenty of unanswered questions, including whether the prognosis used to be ignored in some sufferers, because OCT of all three vessels used to be on hand in barely 59%, and the map in which the usage of high-sensitivity troponin, which used to be left up to the individual establishment, could presumably maintain an designate on the usefulness of OCT and CMR.
It be additionally unknown whether the mechanism is different for ST-phase elevation MI, as the trial included just a few cases, though MINOCA regularly occurs in this surroundings. Future OCT/CMR studies will additionally have to signal up males to resolve seemingly intercourse differences, if any.
Commenting on the observe for theheart.org | Medscape Cardiology, B. Hadley Wilson, MD, Sanger Coronary heart & Vascular Institute in Charlotte, North Carolina, talked about, “There would have to be extra justification of this invasive interventional map to make it seemingly for the wait on outweighed the likelihood of striking a wire and an OCT catheter down sufferers without any principal angiographic blockage and to guarantee interventional cardiologists of its fee right here.”
He pointed out that noninvasive CMR appears worthwhile in the prognosis of practically three-quarters of these sufferers and presumably could presumably well presumably be finished first to direct which of those with an ischemic reason could presumably well take advantage of invasive OCT at catheterization. This appears most pertinent in sufferers with a high suspicion of coronary artery illness or recurrent MINOCA.
“Overall, we favor to maintain in tips the expense, logistics, and little likelihood of these blended modalities, particularly in on a typical foundation apply, earlier than making strategies,” Wilson talked about. “Moreover, since OCT is noteworthy much less on hand than intravascular ultrasound, it could maybe presumably well require a entertaining marketplace paradigm shift to put into effect this multimodality imaging formulation locally and locally in the U.S., including the added fees. Nonetheless, extra observe to direct the more brilliant spend of both CMR and/or blended with OCT is warranted in these sufferers.”
The observe used to be funded by the AHA by means of a grant from the Plod Red for Women Strategically Focused Research Community. Reynolds reported in-form donations from Abbott Vascular and Siemens related to the observe and nonfinancial toughen from BioTelemetry outside the observe. Gulati and Wilson reported having no related disclosures.
American Coronary heart Affiliation (AHA) 2020 Scientific Classes. Supplied November 14, 2020.
Circulation. Published online November 14, 2020. Abstract
Practice Patrice Wendling on Twitter: @pwendl. For more from theheart.org | Medscape Cardiology, be part of us on Twitter and Facebook.
