Portworx gets container-native array management for Pure hardware

Portworx gets container-native array management for Pure hardware

Siarhei – stock.adobe.com

Container storage player Portworx builds in container-native performance to allow discovery, provisioning and management from internal Kubernetes cluster, but easiest on Pure arrays as a lot as now

Antony Adshead

By

Published: 13 Can also fair 2021 14: 00

Pure Storage has announced enhancements to its Portworx Enterprise container storage product that allow it to witness, load steadiness and address Pure Storage FlashArray and FlashBlade hardware natively from deployments within Kubernetes.

That’s the foremost red meat up in version 2.8 of Portworx Enterprise announced at the corporate’s virtual Tempo up occasion this week. It’s an addition that arguably makes Portworx even more of a container-native power storage product than previously.

It has also added a CSI (container storage interface) driver for VMware’s Kubernetes ambiance, Tanzu.

Portworx runs completely from containers in Kubernetes (and varied container orchestrators) and might maybe maybe witness storage and provision and address it on-the-cruise to make power ability for enterprise purposes.

Portworx – obtained by Pure in a $370 million acquisition final one year – is effectively a design-outlined storage product that runs from containers.

It have to create swimming pools of storage, address its provisioning and provide developed storage performance – alongside with backup, misfortune restoration, security, auto-scaling, and migration – on storage native to Kubernetes cluster servers, on exterior storage arrays and ability in the foremost cloud suppliers, AWS, Azure and GCP.

Having mentioned that, moreover swimming pools built on native media and now on Pure Storage hardware, storage ability on exterior on-prem arrays stills settle on to be configured to be readily available in the market to Portworx by strategy of CSI drivers.

And the ability to at as soon as configure and address third receive collectively storage is no longer any longer likely to be extended to varied vendors’ products, or as a minimal no longer in a elope, mentioned Pure Storage worldwide CTO, Alex McMullan.

“Historically, storage is no longer any longer substantial at multi-vendor cooperation. [Extending this functionality to other vendors] is ok with us and there’s no tech motive we couldn’t enact it, but we can focal point first on our absorb clients.”

CSI is a plugin for Kubernetes and varied container orchestrators that allows storage suppliers to repeat their products to containerised purposes as power storage.

At the time of writing, there are about 100 CSIs readily available in the market for an even choice of file, block and object storage in hardware and cloud formats.

CSI presents an interface between container workloads and exterior storage that supports the recount of power storage exterior to the orchestrator, developed performance such as snapshots and cloning, though it lacks some key enterprise factors such as synchronous replication, mentioned McMullan.

The Pure Storage exec used to be hasty to repeat CSI as a appropriate thing, but also pointed to the barriers when storage arrays settle on to retain watch over containerised workloads.

“We now comprise seen an lengthen the size of and volume of storage requests,” mentioned McMullan. “And at rates higher than an array can address. We now comprise possibilities that witness 200 volume requests per 2nd. Storage arrays are no longer arrange to CRUD storage volumes at that scale.”

He added: “CSI is a substantial constructing block and we can proceed to give a enhance to it. And CSI obtained’t turn out to be redundant. It has been a appropriate thing, but there are issues all the contrivance in which by strategy of the price of alternate.”

When requested about future challenges for container storage, McMullan spoke about the observability of with out doubt very wide, and sprawling Kubernetes clusters and the likelihood of bare metal container deployments to supersede those on VMware.

“As an industry now we pick to thought at observability, particularly in wide-scale clusters,” mentioned McMullan. “Kubernetes is complicated to retain watch over.”

“Also, containers on bare metal. Over time, and because the Kubernetes security mannequin improves greater enterprises will be happier with deploying on bare metal but for now VMware presents loads that they need.”

Pure also announced that the corporate’s predictive analytics platform Pure1 will now also embody container cluster and volume metrics that allow for troubleshooting and handy resource management.

Impart material Continues Below


Be taught more on Containers and storage

Be taught More

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *