‘File your lawsuit’: Lin Wood and Sidney Powell acknowledge to Smartmatic’s attach a question to for a retraction
Authorized expert Lin Wood, who is now representing fellow lawyer Sidney Powell, tweeted his response to attorneys from Smartmatic USA Corp. who are traumatic a retraction from Ms. Powell over claims she’s made in regards to the balloting machine company:
I signify Sidney Powell. I essentially agree with conscientiously reviewed your letter of December 15, 2020. I’m now not impressed. Ms. Powell retracts nothing.
File your lawsuit.
Successfully, it’s succinct and to the point:
Shiny my background & skills in defamation regulation, Sidney @SidneyPowell1 asked me to signify her & acknowledge to SmartMatic litigation threat.
Since all the pieces Sidney is announcing about election fraud is documented TRUTH, my response to SmartMatic was straightforward & to the point. pic.twitter.com/bWvhBXmtsi
— Lin Wood (@LLinWood) December 20, 2020
Sidney Powell added that the “same is factual for” any attach a question to for a retraction from Dominion Balloting Systems:
Identical is factual for #Dominion
Heard they wrote me too!
Haven’t viewed it however retracting nothing
We agree with #proof
They are #fraud masters!@tracybeanz @GenFlynn @realDonaldTrump @LLinWood @MajorPatriot @MajorKillSwitch @Scavino45 @marklevinshow @BillWhiteNY @BarbaraRedgate https://t.co/vTIsK5jBX2— Sidney Powell 🇺🇸⭐⭐⭐ (@SidneyPowell1) December 20, 2020
Smartmatic also despatched attach a question to letters to Fox News, OAN and Newsmax:
Smartmatic announced nowadays that it is issuing licensed notices and retraction attach a question to letters to Fox News, Newsmax and One The United States News Community for publishing faux and defamatory statements. The attach a question to letters establish dozens of factually incorrect statements made by each and each of the organizations as fragment of a “disinformation advertising and marketing and marketing and marketing campaign” to danger Smartmatic and discredit the 2020 U.S. election.
In accordance to Smartmatic’s attach a question to letters, these organizations would possibly per chance agree with with out suppose found the falsity of the statements and implications made about Smartmatic by investigating their statements earlier than publishing them to millions of viewers and readers. Smartmatic had nothing to rep with the “controversies” that certain public and private figures agree with alleged in relation to the 2020 U.S. election. Multiple fact-checkers agree with persistently debunked these faux statements with ravishing consistency and regularity.
These court docket cases can be problematic, especially for Newsmax and OAN writes the NYT’s Ben Smith:
Correct threats from Smartmatic/Dominion jeopardize Newsmax & OAN’s dream of fixing into a brand new “Trump TV.” Each are burning money to preserve ratings from Fox, executives from both companies agree with acknowledged, and litigation would possibly per chance dread traders, @benyt writes
— Daniel Chaitin (@danielchaitin7) December 21, 2020
And renowned 1st Modification lawyer Floyd Abrams warned that these court docket cases can be “dangerous” to the media companies. From the NYT:
The letters written by attorneys for Smartmatic and Dominion are “extremely highly efficient,” talked about Floyd Abrams, one in all the nation’s most indispensable First Modification attorneys, in an email to The New York Cases. “The repeated accusations in opposition to both companies are it seems that evidently defamatory and absolutely agree with done sizable reputational and financial hurt to both.”
Mr. Abrams renowned that “truth is continuously a protection” and that, failing that, the networks would possibly per chance defend themselves by announcing they didn’t know the charges had been faux, whereas Ms. Powell would possibly per chance inform she was simply describing licensed filings.
“It’s a long way too early to foretell how the conditions, if commenced, will pause,” he talked about. “Nevertheless it is a long way now not too early to tell that they’ll likely be highly dangerous to these sued.
Multiple Fox News shows, alongside with Lou Dobbs, aired segments which agree with normally debunked their claims in opposition to Semantic over the final few weeks:
WASHPOST: What occurs after Lou Dobbs (and Fox News) is threatened with a lawsuit: He debunks his delight in claims of election fraud https://t.co/4sKUvFGkCg
— Eric Lipton (@EricLiptonNYT) December 20, 2020
This section ran on Maria Bartiromo and Jeanine Pirro’s shows as successfully:
Fox News hosts caught in a web of lies. Maria Bartiromo, Jeanine Pirro, Lou Dobbs all compelled by the network to air true same video of an educated debunking your total conspiracy theories they’ve been peddling. Request it to race on Hannity, Tucker, and Laura too. pic.twitter.com/lJrMO2m7l4
— Mike Sington (@MikeSington) December 20, 2020